<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kurtschemers &#187; wealth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurtschemers.com/tag/wealth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurtschemers.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=438</generator>
		<item>
		<title>$1 Million: Does It Still Mean You&#8217;re Rich?</title>
		<link>http://www.kurtschemers.com/1-million</link>
		<comments>http://www.kurtschemers.com/1-million#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rivers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions & Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurtschemers.com/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Douglas Rice Thursday, December 24, 2009 Becoming a millionaire used to mean you were on top of the world. Nowadays, it means you are climbing up the ladder. While a million dollars is completely out of reach for many people, it&#8217;s just a step along the way for many others. Why? Because it doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><cite> by Douglas Rice<br />
Thursday, December 24, 2009</cite></div>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-910" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="wealth" src="http://www.kurtschemers.com/wp-content/uploads/wealth-300x200.jpg" alt="wealth" width="240" height="160" />Becoming a  millionaire used to mean you were on top of the world. Nowadays, it  means you are climbing up the ladder. While a million dollars is  completely out of reach for many people, it&#8217;s just a step along the way  for many others. Why? Because it doesn&#8217;t go as far as it used to.</div>
<div>
<p>The  term millionaire has been synonymous with being rich ever since we  became a country. The person most often credited to be the first  American millionaire, Elias Hasket Derby, made his fortune as a  privateer during the American revolution. Back then a millionaire did  really mean rich.</p>
<p>Also, we all love round numbers. We love to see  1999 become 2000, and our odometer roll over to 100,000 miles. So it&#8217;s  only natural we would fixate on $1,000,000. It&#8217;s a milestone with a lot  of zeros. It&#8217;s even got an additional comma. Now that&#8217;s rich &#8212; having  two commas in your net worth!  But what does that get you? Not as much  as you would think.</p>
<p><strong>Housing</strong></p>
<p>Housing is where most  people hold their largest chunk of wealth and with real estate falling  considerably in many areas, some might think that the lifestyle a  million dollars would provide would be luxurious. But that depends on  where you live.</p>
<p>There are  plenty of nice places to live that don&#8217;t cost very much, but according  to the California Association of Realtors, the median house price in  Palo Alto, Los Altos, Manhattan Beach and Cupertino is over $1 million.  The median price for the entire San Francisco Bay Area tops $500,000 and  Orange County is right behind at just under that. And those are just  averages, not even something special. While other areas of the country  aren&#8217;t nearly this expensive, being a millionaire in some areas just  means you paid off the mortgage.</p>
<p><strong>Retirement</strong></p>
<p>Another  aspect of becoming a millionaire is not working. If you had a $1 million  right now, could you retire and would your money last? This is a simple  calculation. If you want to try to live off the interest and you invest  the money in tax exempt municipal bonds that pay 4 percent, then you  would have $40,000 a year to live on.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t account for  inflation going forward. If $1 million today doesn&#8217;t feel like much,  imagine what it will feel like in 30 years. At 3 percent inflation  compounding for the next 30 years, $1 million dollars will have the  purchasing power of $412,000 today and your $40,000 income will feel  like $16,500. So retiring when you have $1 million may sound nice, but  it&#8217;s likely that it won&#8217;t be what many people have in mind when they  think of retiring a millionaire.</p>
<p>Instead of living on the  interest, you could tap into the principal as well. Those are slightly  more difficult calculations. For example, if you were 50 years old right  now and wanted to plan for your money to last until you were 95, then  you need money for 45 years in retirement. If you stick with the 4  percent return, then you could withdraw about $48,000 a year. Again this  doesn&#8217;t account for inflation going forward. Each year if prices rise,  your standard of living would fall. In this example, you have 45 years  of prices going up at 3 percent. So that last year will feel like  $12,600 does today.</p>
<p><strong>Combining Retirement and Real Estate</strong></p>
<p>If  we factor in a house, this gets even worse. If we take the price for a  house out of the $1 million, even in a reasonable area and not San  Francisco, it&#8217;s going to be a big piece of your net worth and cut into  your funds for retirement. For example, if you bought a nice $250,000  home, you would only have $750,000 left to live on. At 4 percent that  would be $30,000 a year or $2,500 a month. That&#8217;s before inflation takes  a bit every year.</p>
<p>These retirement calculations show that even if  your house is paid off, that living off a million dollars isn&#8217;t what  it&#8217;s cracked up to be. And if your house isn&#8217;t paid off, it&#8217;s probably  not even close to what you want to do.</p>
<p><strong>Bottom Line</strong></p>
<p>So  the bad news is that even if you fall into a million dollars, you  probably aren&#8217;t set for life, especially if you are young. But the good  news is, you&#8217;ll still be a millionaire, and that&#8217;s better than the  alternative.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kurtschemers.com/1-million/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take back Al Gore&#8217;s Oscar, 2 Academy members demand in light of Climategate</title>
		<link>http://www.kurtschemers.com/take-back-al-gores-oscar</link>
		<comments>http://www.kurtschemers.com/take-back-al-gores-oscar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rivers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinions & Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News & Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Inconvenient Truths"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClimateGate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurtschemers.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 4, 2009 No, it wouldn&#8217;t do anything for the environment. But two Hollywood conservatives (yes, there are some) have called upon the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to rescind the prestigious, profitable gold Oscar statuette that it gave ex-Vice President Al Gore et al two years ago for the environmental movie &#8220;An [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><span style="color: #8b0412; font-size: 130%;"> </span><span style="color: #8b0412;"> </span></p>
<div id="attachment_717" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 189px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-717" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="gore-oscar" src="http://www.kurtschemers.com/wp-content/uploads/gore-oscar-179x240-custom.jpg" alt="gore-oscar" width="179" height="240" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Al Gore accepting his Oscar for &quot;Inconvenient Truths&quot;</p></div>
<p>December  4, 2009</p>
<p>No, it wouldn&#8217;t do anything for the environment.</p>
<p>But two Hollywood conservatives (yes, there are some) have called upon the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to rescind the prestigious, profitable gold Oscar statuette that it gave ex-Vice President <strong>Al Gore</strong> et al two years ago for the environmental movie &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Roger L. Simon</strong> and <strong>Lionel Chetwynd</strong>, both Academy members, are among a small, meandering pack of known political conservatives still believed to be on the loose in the liberal bastion of movie-making.</p>
<p>In 2007, Hollywood&#8217;s Academy sanctified Gore&#8217;s cinematic message of global warming with its famous statue, <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2007/07/more-on-gore.html" target="_blank">enriched his earnings by $100,000 per 85-minute appearance</a> and helped elevate the Tennesseean&#8217;s profile to win the Nobel Peace Prize despite losing the election battle of 2000 to a Texan and living in a large house with lots of energy-driven appliances.</p>
<p>Chetwynd and Simon were prompted to make their hopeless demand this week by the<strong>&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p><!-- sphereit end --></div>
<p>&#8230;leak two weeks ago of a blizzard of British academic e-mails purporting to show that scientists at the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit systematically falsified data to document the appearance of global warming in recent years.</p>
<p>The university is reportedly investigating the claims, which added dry fuel to the never-ending political debate over whether the Earth really is warming as a result of human activity or if it&#8217;s just normal natural cycles and the debate is what&#8217;s heated. The demand to withdraw Gore&#8217;s award provides yet another opportunity to argue.</p>
<p>The startling leak comes at an inconvenient time just before next week&#8217;s United Nations&#8217; climate change meeting that will cause an immense carbon footprint with thousands of people flying up or over to Denmark to talk about saving the environment.</p>
<p>These airplanes will include Air Force One with its primary passenger President <strong>Obama,</strong> who&#8217;s returning to the Copenhagen scene where he didn&#8217;t help win the 2016 Summer Olympics for Chicago, which could do with a little global warming at this time of year.</p>
<p>Simon, a screenwriter who is also chief executive officer of <a href="tp://pajamasmedia.com/" target="_blank">Pajamas Media</a>, a network of conservative online blogs, conceded he knew of no precedent for the Academy withdrawing a previously-awarded Oscar, despite decades of Hollywood hijinks and worse. But, he added, &#8220;I think they should rescind this one.&#8221;</p>
<p><a style="float: left;" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0128760e0e8b970c-popup"><img style="margin: 6px 6px 6px 4px; width: 300px;" src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0128760e0e8b970c-300wi" alt="Democrat ex-VP Al Gore talking about the environment" /></a></p>
<p>The controversial leaked documents <a href="http://www.climate-gate.org/" target="_blank">have been assembled here by Pajamas Media</a> and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The joint demand by Simon and filmmaker Chetwynd is <a href="http://www.pjtv.com/video/Poliwood/Climategate_Hits_Hollywood%3A_Should_the_Academy_Rescind_Gore%27s_Oscar%3F/2780/;jsessionid=abcowwO-8vPzC5mPVAyvs" target="_blank">available on video here.</a></p>
<p>The television news-watching world in America has not learned much about the so-called Climategate scandal because it has not really been mentioned on the air except for a notorious cable news channel named for a three-lettered, wily, wild animal that often seems to revel in debunking liberal shibboleths.</p>
<p>Network news programs have been far more concerned with the obviously more important White House party-crasher story involving a couple of formally-dressed phonies.</p>
<p>The falsified documents do not come up in Gore interview excerpts <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30063.html" target="_blank">published late last night here</a> by Politico&#8217;s John F. Harris and Mike Allen.</p>
<p>This week White House Press Secy. <strong>Robert Gibbs</strong> claimed that global warming was no longer in dispute by most people. But<a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/americans_skeptical_of_science_behind_global_warming" target="_blank"> a subsequent Rasmussen Reports poll</a> of Americans finds only one in four adults believe most scientists agree on the topic.</p>
<p>And while only 20% claim to have followed the leaked e-mail story Very Closely, nearly 60% believe it is at least somewhat likely that scientists have falsified environmental data to support their own global warming beliefs and theories.</p>
<p>&#8211; Andrew Malcolm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kurtschemers.com/take-back-al-gores-oscar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

